From: Russell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:09:30 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: [ARM] Fix ARM __raw_read_trylock() implementation
X-Git-Tag: v6.6-pxa1908~58799^2~4
X-Git-Url: https://git.dujemihanovic.xyz/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8e34703b9315688305306d26148088b0a8292563;p=linux.git

[ARM] Fix ARM __raw_read_trylock() implementation

Matthew Wilcox pointed out that the generic implementation
of this is unfit for use.  Here's an ARM optimised version
instead.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
---

diff --git a/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h b/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h
index 406ca97a8ab2..e2f1d75171df 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/spinlock.h
@@ -199,7 +199,21 @@ static inline void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 	: "cc");
 }
 
-#define __raw_read_trylock(lock) generic__raw_read_trylock(lock)
+static inline int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	unsigned long tmp tmp2 = 1;
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+"1:	ldrex	%0, [%2]\n"
+"	adds	%0, %0, #1\n"
+"	strexpl	%1, %0, [%2]\n"
+	: "=&r" (tmp), "+r" (tmp2)
+	: "r" (&rw->lock)
+	: "cc");
+
+	smp_mb();
+	return tmp2 == 0;
+}
 
 /* read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed? */
 #define __raw_read_can_lock(x)		((x)->lock < 0x80000000)