[Syzbot reported]
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00019-gb311c1b497e5 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/78 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801b8d8930 (&group->mark_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fsnotify_group_lock include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h:270 [inline]
ffff88801b8d8930 (&group->mark_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: fsnotify_destroy_mark+0x38/0x3c0 fs/notify/mark.c:578
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8ea2fd60 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6841 [inline]
ffffffff8ea2fd60 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbb4/0x35a0 mm/vmscan.c:7223
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
...
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x3d/0x2a0 mm/slub.c:4044
inotify_new_watch fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:599 [inline]
inotify_update_watch fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:647 [inline]
__do_sys_inotify_add_watch fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:786 [inline]
__se_sys_inotify_add_watch+0x72e/0x1070 fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:729
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&group->mark_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
...
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
fsnotify_group_lock include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h:270 [inline]
fsnotify_destroy_mark+0x38/0x3c0 fs/notify/mark.c:578
fsnotify_destroy_marks+0x14a/0x660 fs/notify/mark.c:934
fsnotify_inoderemove include/linux/fsnotify.h:264 [inline]
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2e0/0x430 fs/dcache.c:403
__dentry_kill+0x20d/0x630 fs/dcache.c:610
shrink_kill+0xa9/0x2c0 fs/dcache.c:1055
shrink_dentry_list+0x2c0/0x5b0 fs/dcache.c:1082
prune_dcache_sb+0x10f/0x180 fs/dcache.c:1163
super_cache_scan+0x34f/0x4b0 fs/super.c:221
do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4815
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4876 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4954 [inline]
shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5934
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6762 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6954 [inline]
kswapd+0x1bcd/0x35a0 mm/vmscan.c:7223
[Analysis]
The problem is that inotify_new_watch() is using GFP_KERNEL to allocate
new watches under group->mark_mutex, however if dentry reclaim races
with unlinking of an inode, it can end up dropping the last dentry reference
for an unlinked inode resulting in removal of fsnotify mark from reclaim
context which wants to acquire group->mark_mutex as well.
This scenario shows that all notification groups are in principle prone
to this kind of a deadlock (previously, we considered only fanotify and
dnotify to be problematic for other reasons) so make sure all
allocations under group->mark_mutex happen with GFP_NOFS.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+c679f13773f295d2da53@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c679f13773f295d2da53
Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240927143642.2369508-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com
}
nfsd_file_fsnotify_group = fsnotify_alloc_group(&nfsd_file_fsnotify_ops,
- FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS);
+ 0);
if (IS_ERR(nfsd_file_fsnotify_group)) {
pr_err("nfsd: unable to create fsnotify group: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(nfsd_file_fsnotify_group));
SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT);
dnotify_mark_cache = KMEM_CACHE(dnotify_mark, SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT);
- dnotify_group = fsnotify_alloc_group(&dnotify_fsnotify_ops,
- FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS);
+ dnotify_group = fsnotify_alloc_group(&dnotify_fsnotify_ops, 0);
if (IS_ERR(dnotify_group))
panic("unable to allocate fsnotify group for dnotify\n");
dnotify_sysctl_init();
/* fsnotify_alloc_group takes a ref. Dropped in fanotify_release */
group = fsnotify_alloc_group(&fanotify_fsnotify_ops,
- FSNOTIFY_GROUP_USER | FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS);
+ FSNOTIFY_GROUP_USER);
if (IS_ERR(group)) {
return PTR_ERR(group);
}
const struct fsnotify_ops *ops,
int flags, gfp_t gfp)
{
- static struct lock_class_key nofs_marks_lock;
struct fsnotify_group *group;
group = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsnotify_group), gfp);
group->ops = ops;
group->flags = flags;
- /*
- * For most backends, eviction of inode with a mark is not expected,
- * because marks hold a refcount on the inode against eviction.
- *
- * Use a different lockdep class for groups that support evictable
- * inode marks, because with evictable marks, mark_mutex is NOT
- * fs-reclaim safe - the mutex is taken when evicting inodes.
- */
- if (flags & FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS)
- lockdep_set_class(&group->mark_mutex, &nofs_marks_lock);
return group;
}
#define FSNOTIFY_GROUP_USER 0x01 /* user allocated group */
#define FSNOTIFY_GROUP_DUPS 0x02 /* allow multiple marks per object */
-#define FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS 0x04 /* group lock is not direct reclaim safe */
int flags;
unsigned int owner_flags; /* stored flags of mark_mutex owner */
static inline void fsnotify_group_lock(struct fsnotify_group *group)
{
mutex_lock(&group->mark_mutex);
- if (group->flags & FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS)
- group->owner_flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
+ group->owner_flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
}
static inline void fsnotify_group_unlock(struct fsnotify_group *group)
{
- if (group->flags & FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS)
- memalloc_nofs_restore(group->owner_flags);
+ memalloc_nofs_restore(group->owner_flags);
mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
}
static inline void fsnotify_group_assert_locked(struct fsnotify_group *group)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&group->mark_mutex));
- if (group->flags & FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS)
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS));
}
/* When calling fsnotify tell it if the data is a path or inode */
projects / linux.git / commitdiff