]> git.dujemihanovic.xyz Git - linux.git/commitdiff
clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range()
authorMaxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:25:17 +0000 (13:25 +0200)
committerStephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:31:05 +0000 (09:31 -0700)
clk_set_rate_range() will use the last requested rate for the clock when
it calls into the driver set_rate hook.

However, if CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE is set on that clock, the last
requested rate might not be matching the current rate of the clock. In
such a case, let's read out the rate from the hardware and use that in
our set_rate instead.

Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-13-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
drivers/clk/clk.c
drivers/clk/clk_test.c

index caa2eb6404416f03a0bb9c19235039057109627f..53b28e63deae3d92048514dc08426313eaa398ae 100644 (file)
@@ -2373,6 +2373,10 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk,
                goto out;
        }
 
+       rate = clk->core->req_rate;
+       if (clk->core->flags & CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE)
+               rate = clk_core_get_rate_recalc(clk->core);
+
        /*
         * Since the boundaries have been changed, let's give the
         * opportunity to the provider to adjust the clock rate based on
@@ -2390,7 +2394,7 @@ static int clk_set_rate_range_nolock(struct clk *clk,
         * - the determine_rate() callback does not really check for
         *   this corner case when determining the rate
         */
-       rate = clamp(clk->core->req_rate, min, max);
+       rate = clamp(rate, min, max);
        ret = clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, rate);
        if (ret) {
                /* rollback the changes */
index ceed49c5a88bfe721fb54719e22054f37701f85c..d3e121f21ae21b6e5744160847f51a5dd51bc118 100644 (file)
@@ -375,9 +375,40 @@ static void clk_test_uncached_set_range(struct kunit *test)
        clk_put(clk);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test that for an uncached clock, clk_set_rate_range() will work
+ * properly if the rate has changed in hardware.
+ *
+ * In this case, it means that if the rate wasn't initially in the range
+ * we're trying to set, but got changed at some point into the range
+ * without the kernel knowing about it, its rate shouldn't be affected.
+ */
+static void clk_test_uncached_updated_rate_set_range(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct clk_dummy_context *ctx = test->priv;
+       struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+       struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL);
+       unsigned long rate;
+
+       /* We change the rate behind the clock framework's back */
+       ctx->rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000;
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test,
+                       clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+                                          DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+                                          DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2),
+                       0);
+
+       rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
+
+       clk_put(clk);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case clk_uncached_test_cases[] = {
        KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_get_rate),
        KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_set_range),
+       KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_uncached_updated_rate_set_range),
        {}
 };