From 79e1d289b71aec48ce765513eaeb5c12992fa348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:13:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] sandbox: test: Tidy up spl_test_load() calls Use the new sandbox_find_next_phase() function, which does what is needed here. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- test/image/spl_load.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/image/spl_load.c b/test/image/spl_load.c index e7cabf5680..df389e26f9 100644 --- a/test/image/spl_load.c +++ b/test/image/spl_load.c @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ struct image_header *spl_get_load_buffer(ssize_t offset, size_t size) static int spl_test_load(struct unit_test_state *uts) { - const char *cur_prefix, *next_prefix; struct spl_image_info image; struct image_header *header; struct text_ctx text_ctx; @@ -69,10 +68,7 @@ static int spl_test_load(struct unit_test_state *uts) load.bl_len = 512; load.read = read_fit_image; - cur_prefix = spl_phase_prefix(spl_phase()); - next_prefix = spl_phase_prefix(spl_next_phase()); - ret = os_find_u_boot(fname, sizeof(fname), true, cur_prefix, - next_prefix); + ret = sandbox_find_next_phase(fname, sizeof(fname), true); if (ret) { printf("(%s not found, error %d)\n", fname, ret); return ret; -- 2.39.5