From 7f0f4e1825d1cbc64f6f8cba17f6deb7282acb2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 19:39:20 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] tools: Avoid showing return value of clock_gettime() This value is either 0 for success or -1 for error. Coverity reports that "ret" is passed to a parameter that cannot be negative, pointing to the condition 'if (ret < 0)'. Adjust it to just check for non-zero and avoid showing -1 in the error message, which is pointless. Perhaps these changes will molify Coverity. Reported-by: Coverity (CID: 312956) Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- tools/image-host.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/image-host.c b/tools/image-host.c index 73095461a7..d3a882ec29 100644 --- a/tools/image-host.c +++ b/tools/image-host.c @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int get_random_data(void *data, int size) { unsigned char *tmp = data; struct timespec date; - int i, ret = 0; + int i, ret; if (!tmp) { printf("%s: pointer data is NULL\n", __func__); @@ -338,9 +338,9 @@ static int get_random_data(void *data, int size) } ret = clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &date); - if (ret < 0) { - printf("%s: clock_gettime has failed (err=%d, str=%s)\n", - __func__, ret, strerror(errno)); + if (ret) { + printf("%s: clock_gettime has failed (%s)\n", __func__, + strerror(errno)); goto out; } -- 2.39.5