From: Simon Glass Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 02:42:09 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Revert "x86: broadwell: gpio: Remove the codes to set up pin control" X-Git-Url: http://git.dujemihanovic.xyz/img/static/gitweb.css?a=commitdiff_plain;h=26f50fbed2f19edf0c4a2eb80e7fa12941764660;p=u-boot.git Revert "x86: broadwell: gpio: Remove the codes to set up pin control" This makes the assumption that setting up pinctrl in cpu_init_r() is safe. On samus we need GPIOs before relocation in order to support power control. This commit fixes the following message on boot: initcall sequence ffe5c6f4 failed at call ffe01d3d (err=-1) ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ### In any case it seems better to leave init to driver model, so that it can pick up the GPIO driver when it needs it. Since pinctrl is a dependency of the GPIO driver, we may as well put the dependency there and avoid these problems. This reverts commit 9769e05bcf79939bad23a719982dd1f85a110f3c. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Bin Meng --- diff --git a/drivers/gpio/intel_broadwell_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/intel_broadwell_gpio.c index 8b50900f9f..81ce446e1a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/intel_broadwell_gpio.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/intel_broadwell_gpio.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -118,6 +119,12 @@ static int broadwell_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) struct broadwell_bank_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(dev); struct gpio_dev_priv *uc_priv = dev_get_uclass_priv(dev); struct broadwell_bank_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev); + struct udevice *pinctrl; + int ret; + + /* Set up pin control if available */ + ret = syscon_get_by_driver_data(X86_SYSCON_PINCONF, &pinctrl); + debug("%s, pinctrl=%p, ret=%d\n", __func__, pinctrl, ret); uc_priv->gpio_count = GPIO_PER_BANK; uc_priv->bank_name = plat->bank_name;