From: Pierre Bourdon Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:50:49 +0000 (+0200) Subject: fs: btrfs: fix false negatives in ROOT_ITEM search X-Git-Url: http://git.dujemihanovic.xyz/img/static/git-logo.png?a=commitdiff_plain;h=633967f9818cb6a0e87ffa8cba33148a5bcc6edb;p=u-boot.git fs: btrfs: fix false negatives in ROOT_ITEM search ROOT_ITEMs in btrfs are referenced without knowing their actual "offset" value. To perform these searches using only two items from the key, the btrfs driver uses a special "btrfs_search_tree_key_type" function. The algorithm used by that function to transform a 3-tuple search into a 2-tuple search was subtly broken, leading to items not being found if they were the first in their tree node. This commit fixes btrfs_search_tree_key_type to properly behave in these situations. Signed-off-by: Pierre Bourdon Cc: Marek Behun --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index 65c152a52f..ca44a2404d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -292,20 +292,52 @@ btrfs_search_tree_key_type(const struct btrfs_root *root, u64 objectid, { struct btrfs_key key, *res; + /* + * In some cases (e.g. tree roots), we need to look for a given + * objectid and type without knowing the offset value (3rd element of a + * btrfs tree node key). We can rely on the fact that btrfs_search_tree + * returns the first element with key >= search_key, and then perform + * our own comparison between the returned element and the search key. + * + * It is tempting to use a search key with offset 0 to perform this + * "fuzzy search". This would return the first item with the (objectid, + * type) we're looking for. However, using offset 0 has the wrong + * behavior when the wanted item is the first in a leaf: since our + * search key will be lower than the wanted item, the recursive search + * will explore the wrong branch of the tree. + * + * Instead, use the largest possible offset (-1). The result of this + * search will either be: + * 1. An element with the (objectid, type) we're looking for, if it + * has offset -1 or if it is the last element in its leaf. + * 2. The first element *after* an element with the (objectid, type) + */ key.objectid = objectid; key.type = type; - key.offset = 0; + key.offset = -1; if (btrfs_search_tree(root, &key, path)) return NULL; - res = btrfs_path_leaf_key(path); - if (btrfs_comp_keys_type(&key, res)) { - btrfs_free_path(path); - return NULL; + /* + * Compare with the previous element first -- this is the likely case + * since the result of the search is only what we want if it had offset + * == -1 or if it was last in its leaf. + */ + if (path->slots[0] > 0) { + path->slots[0]--; + res = btrfs_path_leaf_key(path); + if (!btrfs_comp_keys_type(&key, res)) + return res; + path->slots[0]++; } - return res; + res = btrfs_path_leaf_key(path); + if (!btrfs_comp_keys_type(&key, res)) + return res; + + btrfs_free_path(path); + return NULL; } static inline u32 btrfs_path_item_size(struct btrfs_path *p)