From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:29:43 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: sf: Fix entries for S25FL256S_256K and S25FL512S_256K
X-Git-Tag: v2025.01-rc5-pxa1908~15423^2~51
X-Git-Url: http://git.dujemihanovic.xyz/img/static/git-favicon.png?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c1f9325965b141f08434ce3749d3b5e713f312a3;p=u-boot.git
sf: Fix entries for S25FL256S_256K and S25FL512S_256K
Both of these chips have 256kB big sectors, thus the _256K suffix,
compared to their _64K counterparts, which have 64kB sectors. Also,
they have four times less sectors than their _64K counterparts.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Tested-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaganna@xilinx.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
index daf8fe7671..5f63023ec8 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = {
{"S25FL032P", 0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
{"S25FL064P", 0x010216, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
{"S25FL128S_64K", 0x012018, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
- {"S25FL256S_256K", 0x010219, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
+ {"S25FL256S_256K", 0x010219, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
{"S25FL256S_64K", 0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
- {"S25FL512S_256K", 0x010220, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 1024, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
+ {"S25FL512S_256K", 0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
{"S25FL512S_64K", 0x010220, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 1024, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO /* STMICRO */