From 9b7474d83b45d2b738866e9a4a46fe2b498a65d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Suchanek Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:58:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] dm: blk: Do not use uclass_next_device_err blk_first_device_err/blk_next_device_err uses uclass_first_device_err/uclass_next_device_err for device iteration. Although the function names superficially match the return value from uclass_first_device_err/uclass_next_device_err is never used meaningfully, and uclass_first_device/uclass_next_device works equally well for this purpose. In the following patch the semantic of uclass_first_device_err/uclass_next_device_err will be changed to be based on uclass_first_device_check/uclass_next_device_check breaking this sole user that uses uclass_next_device_err for iteration. Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek Reviewed-by: Simon Glass --- drivers/block/blk-uclass.c | 16 ++++++---------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/blk-uclass.c b/drivers/block/blk-uclass.c index 7d12d5413f..bcc14a684b 100644 --- a/drivers/block/blk-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/block/blk-uclass.c @@ -593,11 +593,9 @@ int blk_find_next(enum blk_flag_t flags, struct udevice **devp) int blk_first_device_err(enum blk_flag_t flags, struct udevice **devp) { - int ret; - - for (ret = uclass_first_device_err(UCLASS_BLK, devp); - !ret; - ret = uclass_next_device_err(devp)) { + for (uclass_first_device(UCLASS_BLK, devp); + *devp; + uclass_next_device(devp)) { if (!blk_flags_check(*devp, flags)) return 0; } @@ -607,11 +605,9 @@ int blk_first_device_err(enum blk_flag_t flags, struct udevice **devp) int blk_next_device_err(enum blk_flag_t flags, struct udevice **devp) { - int ret; - - for (ret = uclass_next_device_err(devp); - !ret; - ret = uclass_next_device_err(devp)) { + for (uclass_next_device(devp); + *devp; + uclass_next_device(devp)) { if (!blk_flags_check(*devp, flags)) return 0; } -- 2.39.5