From 642a86041228974c154dc7e250f3d1e0b8adf33f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Simek Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:29:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gpio: xilinx: Simplify logic in xilinx_gpio_set_value There is no reason to do read/write for if/else separately. Reported-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier Signed-off-by: Michal Simek Reviewed-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier --- drivers/gpio/xilinx_gpio.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/xilinx_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/xilinx_gpio.c index 1e5f3da8d7..cccfa75617 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/xilinx_gpio.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/xilinx_gpio.c @@ -61,18 +61,17 @@ static int xilinx_gpio_set_value(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset, if (ret) return ret; + val = readl(&platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2); + debug("%s: regs: %lx, value: %x, gpio: %x, bank %x, pin %x\n", __func__, (ulong)platdata->regs, value, offset, bank, pin); - if (value) { - val = readl(&platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2); + if (value) val = val | (1 << pin); - writel(val, &platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2); - } else { - val = readl(&platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2); + else val = val & ~(1 << pin); - writel(val, &platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2); - } + + writel(val, &platdata->regs->gpiodata + bank * 2); return val; }; -- 2.39.5