In both the Freescale DDR controller and the SPD spec, bank address bits
are stored as the number of bank address bits minus 2. For example, if a
chip had 8 banks (3 total bank address bits), the value of
bank_addr_bits would be 1. This is rather surprising for users
configuring their memory manually, since they can't set bank_addr_bits
to the actual number of bank address bits. Rectify this.
There is at least one example of this kind of mistake already, in
board/freescale/t102xrdb/ddr.c. The documented MT40A512M8HX has two bank
address bits, but bank_addr_bits was set to 2, implying 4 bank address
bits. Such a value is reserved in BA_BITS_CS, but I suspect the
controller simply ignores the top bit, making this kind of mistake
harmless, if misleading.
Fixes: e8a7f1c32b5 ("powerpc/t1023rdb: Add T1023 RDB board support")
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
.mirrored_dimm = 0,
.n_row_addr = 15,
.n_col_addr = 10,
- .bank_addr_bits = 0,
+ .bank_addr_bits = 2,
.bank_group_bits = 2,
.edc_config = 0,
.burst_lengths_bitmask = 0x0c,
odt_rd_cfg = popts->cs_local_opts[i].odt_rd_cfg;
odt_wr_cfg = popts->cs_local_opts[i].odt_wr_cfg;
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DDR4
- ba_bits_cs_n = dimm_params[dimm_number].bank_addr_bits;
+ ba_bits_cs_n = dimm_params[dimm_number].bank_addr_bits - 2;
bg_bits_cs_n = dimm_params[dimm_number].bank_group_bits;
#else
n_banks_per_sdram_device
/* SDRAM device parameters */
pdimm->n_row_addr = ((spd->addressing >> 3) & 0x7) + 12;
pdimm->n_col_addr = (spd->addressing & 0x7) + 9;
- pdimm->bank_addr_bits = (spd->density_banks >> 4) & 0x3;
+ pdimm->bank_addr_bits = ((spd->density_banks >> 4) & 0x3) + 2;
pdimm->bank_group_bits = (spd->density_banks >> 6) & 0x3;
/*