Using memcpy() is, however tempting, not a good idea: It depends on the
specific implementation of memcpy, also lacks barriers. In this
particular case the first registers were written using 64-bit writes,
and the last register using four separate single-byte writes.
Replace the memcpy with a proper loop using the writel() accessor.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Tested-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net> Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net> Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>