From 18e8672449d812ba7791f166245bc45eab30dbf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:48:38 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] JFFS2: Correct jffs2_1pass_build_lists to use lldiv

Since part_info size became 64bit we need to use lldiv here.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
---
 fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c
index c856983ef4..3fb5db383e 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_1pass.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@
 #include <common.h>
 #include <config.h>
 #include <malloc.h>
+#include <div64.h>
 #include <linux/stat.h>
 #include <linux/time.h>
 #include <watchdog.h>
@@ -1438,7 +1439,7 @@ jffs2_1pass_build_lists(struct part_info * part)
 {
 	struct b_lists *pL;
 	struct jffs2_unknown_node *node;
-	u32 nr_sectors = part->size/part->sector_size;
+	u32 nr_sectors;
 	u32 i;
 	u32 counter4 = 0;
 	u32 counterF = 0;
@@ -1447,6 +1448,7 @@ jffs2_1pass_build_lists(struct part_info * part)
 	u32 buf_size = DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE;
 	char *buf;
 
+	nr_sectors = lldiv(part->size, part->sector_size);
 	/* turn off the lcd.  Refreshing the lcd adds 50% overhead to the */
 	/* jffs2 list building enterprise nope.  in newer versions the overhead is */
 	/* only about 5 %.  not enough to inconvenience people for. */
-- 
2.39.5