Calling calloc() for 0 members does not make any sense.
Setting ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL for ch_priv->desc_cnt > 0 is equally
unreasonable.
The current code will lead to a NULL dereference in bcm6348_iudma_enable().
The assignments for ch_priv->busy_desc are obviously swapped.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
ch_priv->desc_id = 0;
if (bcm6348_iudma_chan_is_rx(dma->id)) {
ch_priv->desc_cnt = 0;
- ch_priv->busy_desc = calloc(ch_priv->desc_cnt, sizeof(bool));
+ ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL;
} else {
ch_priv->desc_cnt = ch_priv->dma_ring_size;
- ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL;
+ ch_priv->busy_desc = calloc(ch_priv->desc_cnt, sizeof(bool));
}
return 0;