From 4fd64d02b2bb7fe583c1246c79b9658223d96442 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:27:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix memalign() parameter order
Purely by code inspection, it looks like the parameter order to memalign()
is swapped; its parameters are (align, size). 4096 is a likely desired
alignment, and a variable named size sounds like a size:-)
Fixes: 45b5a37836d5 ("x86: Add multi-processor init")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c b/arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c
index 7917350bff..fc2fb5bf44 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static int load_sipi_vector(atomic_t **ap_countp, int num_cpus)
params->stack_size = CONFIG_AP_STACK_SIZE;
size = params->stack_size * num_cpus;
- stack = memalign(size, 4096);
+ stack = memalign(4096, size);
if (!stack)
return -ENOMEM;
params->stack_top = (u32)(stack + size);
--
2.39.5