From a9e414dd50c57113f810812af1fd1d1f502b3f57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 09:02:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] efi: Correct address handling with ACPI tables The current EFI implementation confuses pointers and addresses. Normally we can get away with this but in the case of sandbox it causes failures. Despite the fact that efi_allocate_pages() returns a u64, it is actually a pointer, not an address. Add special handling to avoid a crash when running 'bootefi hello'. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- lib/efi_loader/efi_acpi.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_acpi.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_acpi.c index f2b55b49b6..2ddc3502b5 100644 --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_acpi.c +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_acpi.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include static const efi_guid_t acpi_guid = EFI_ACPI_TABLE_GUID; @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_acpi_register(void) /* Map within the low 32 bits, to allow for 32bit ACPI tables */ u64 acpi = U32_MAX; efi_status_t ret; + ulong addr; /* Reserve 64kiB page for ACPI */ ret = efi_allocate_pages(EFI_ALLOCATE_MAX_ADDRESS, @@ -34,7 +36,8 @@ efi_status_t efi_acpi_register(void) * a 4k-aligned address, so it is safe to assume that * write_acpi_tables() will write the table at that address. */ - write_acpi_tables((ulong)acpi); + addr = map_to_sysmem((void *)(ulong)acpi); + write_acpi_tables(addr); /* And expose them to our EFI payload */ return efi_install_configuration_table(&acpi_guid, -- 2.39.5