x86: fsp: Report correct number of E820 table entries

The logic to calculate the number of E820 table entries is wrong
when walking through the FSP HOB tables. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jian Luo <jian.luo4@boschrexroth.de>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c
index 28552fa15a0e32b8601cb177a7ff26b58d727304..e51ca96eb712fa514384cbe81278e4b5c091964d 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c
@@ -72,9 +72,10 @@ unsigned install_e820_map(unsigned max_entries, struct e820entry *entries)
                                entries[num_entries].type = E820_RAM;
                        else if (res_desc->type == RES_MEM_RESERVED)
                                entries[num_entries].type = E820_RESERVED;
+
+                       num_entries++;
                }
                hdr = get_next_hob(hdr);
-               num_entries++;
        }
 
        /* Mark PCIe ECAM address range as reserved */