From: Tom Rini Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:09:30 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Merge patch series "Make LMB memory map global and persistent" X-Git-Url: http://git.dujemihanovic.xyz/%22http:/www.sics.se/static/%7B%7B%20.RelPermalink%20%7D%7D?a=commitdiff_plain;h=360aaddd9cea8c256f50c576794415cadfb61819;p=u-boot.git Merge patch series "Make LMB memory map global and persistent" Sughosh Ganu says: This is a follow-up from an earlier RFC series [1] for making the LMB and EFI memory allocations work together. This is a non-rfc version with only the LMB part of the patches, for making the LMB memory map global and persistent. This is part one of a set of patches which aim to have the LMB and EFI memory allocations work together. This requires making the LMB memory map global and persistent, instead of having local, caller specific maps. This is being done keeping in mind the usage of LMB memory by platforms where the same memory region can be used to load multiple different images. What is not allowed is to overwrite memory that has been allocated by the other module, currently the EFI memory module. This is being achieved by introducing a new flag, LMB_NOOVERWRITE, which represents memory which cannot be re-requested once allocated. The data structures (alloced lists) required for maintaining the LMB map are initialised during board init. The LMB module is enabled by default for the main U-Boot image, while it needs to be enabled for SPL. This version also uses a stack implementation, as suggested by Simon Glass to temporarily store the lmb structure instance which is used during normal operation when running lmb tests. This does away with the need to run the lmb tests separately. The tests have been tweaked where needed because of these changes. The second part of the patches, to be sent subsequently, would work on having the EFI allocations work with the LMB API's. [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20240704073544.670249-1-sughosh.ganu@linaro.org/T/#t Notes: 1) These patches are on next, as the alist patches have been applied to that branch. 2) I have tested the boot on the ST DK2 board, but it would be good to get a T-b/R-b from the ST maintainers. 3) It will be good to test these changes on a PowerPC platform (ideally an 85xx, as I do not have one). --- 360aaddd9cea8c256f50c576794415cadfb61819 diff --cc common/spl/spl.c index 5886d2c512,c3a4424072..c13b2b8f71 --- a/common/spl/spl.c +++ b/common/spl/spl.c @@@ -718,9 -715,12 +715,12 @@@ void board_init_r(gd_t *dummy1, ulong d initr_watchdog(); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT) || CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(HANDOFF) || - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_ATF)) + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_ATF) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_NET)) dram_init_banksize(); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_LMB)) + lmb_init(); + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PCI) && !(gd->flags & GD_FLG_DM_DEAD)) { ret = pci_init(); if (ret)