From 196193a4d4963a8dde00c7cdd0ec83b60ea61e61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 02:11:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86: fsp: Report correct number of E820 table entries The logic to calculate the number of E820 table entries is wrong when walking through the FSP HOB tables. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jian Luo <jian.luo4@boschrexroth.de> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> --- arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c index 28552fa15a..e51ca96eb7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c +++ b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_dram.c @@ -72,9 +72,10 @@ unsigned install_e820_map(unsigned max_entries, struct e820entry *entries) entries[num_entries].type = E820_RAM; else if (res_desc->type == RES_MEM_RESERVED) entries[num_entries].type = E820_RESERVED; + + num_entries++; } hdr = get_next_hob(hdr); - num_entries++; } /* Mark PCIe ECAM address range as reserved */ -- 2.39.5