From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 07:02:12 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: bootstd: Correct logic for single uclass
X-Git-Url: http://git.dujemihanovic.xyz/%22/img/sics.gif/%22/static/git-favicon.png?a=commitdiff_plain;h=16e19350d91e3c7e916b85b84c0364b20ac193d2;p=u-boot.git

bootstd: Correct logic for single uclass

The current logic for "bootflow mmc" is flawed since it checks the
uclass of the bootdev instead of its parent, the media device. Correct
this and add a test that covers this scenario.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ivan T.Ivanov <iivanov@suse.de>
---

diff --git a/boot/bootflow.c b/boot/bootflow.c
index 6ef62e1d18..7f5b0e9420 100644
--- a/boot/bootflow.c
+++ b/boot/bootflow.c
@@ -155,6 +155,27 @@ static void bootflow_iter_set_dev(struct bootflow_iter *iter,
 	}
 }
 
+/**
+ * scan_next_in_uclass() - Scan for the next bootdev in the same media uclass
+ *
+ * Move through the following bootdevs until we find another in this media
+ * uclass, or run out
+ *
+ * @devp: On entry, the device to check, on exit the new device, or NULL if
+ * there is none
+ */
+static void scan_next_in_uclass(struct udevice **devp)
+{
+	struct udevice *dev = *devp;
+	enum uclass_id cur_id = device_get_uclass_id(dev->parent);
+
+	do {
+		uclass_find_next_device(&dev);
+	} while (dev && cur_id != device_get_uclass_id(dev->parent));
+
+	*devp = dev;
+}
+
 /**
  * iter_incr() - Move to the next item (method, part, bootdev)
  *
@@ -230,8 +251,7 @@ static int iter_incr(struct bootflow_iter *iter)
 						 &method_flags);
 		} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTSTD_FULL) &&
 			   (iter->flags & BOOTFLOWIF_SINGLE_UCLASS)) {
-			/* Move to the next bootdev in this uclass */
-			uclass_find_next_device(&dev);
+			scan_next_in_uclass(&dev);
 			if (!dev) {
 				log_debug("finished uclass %s\n",
 					  dev_get_uclass_name(dev));
diff --git a/test/boot/bootdev.c b/test/boot/bootdev.c
index 7228f545e9..6378617480 100644
--- a/test/boot/bootdev.c
+++ b/test/boot/bootdev.c
@@ -232,6 +232,19 @@ static int bootdev_test_order(struct unit_test_state *uts)
 			iter.dev_used[2]->name);
 	bootflow_iter_uninit(&iter);
 
+	/* Try a single uclass */
+	ut_assertok(env_set("boot_targets", NULL));
+	ut_assertok(bootflow_scan_first(NULL, "mmc", &iter, 0, &bflow));
+	ut_asserteq(2, iter.num_devs);
+
+	/* Now scan pass mmc1 and make sure that only mmc0 shows up */
+	ut_asserteq(-ENODEV, bootflow_scan_next(&iter, &bflow));
+	ut_asserteq(3, iter.num_devs);
+	ut_asserteq_str("mmc2.bootdev", iter.dev_used[0]->name);
+	ut_asserteq_str("mmc1.bootdev", iter.dev_used[1]->name);
+	ut_asserteq_str("mmc0.bootdev", iter.dev_used[2]->name);
+	bootflow_iter_uninit(&iter);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 BOOTSTD_TEST(bootdev_test_order, UT_TESTF_DM | UT_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);